Timed “Up & Go” Test: Reliability in Older People Dependent in Activities of Daily Living— Focus on Cognitive State

Author:

Nordin Ellinor1,Rosendahl Erik2,Lundin-Olsson Lillemor3

Affiliation:

1. E Nordin, PT, MSc, is a doctoral student, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric Medicine, Umea University, SE-901 87 Umea, Sweden

2. E Rosendahl, PT, MSc, is a doctoral student, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric Medicine, Umea University

3. L Lundin-Olsson, PT, PhD, is Researcher, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric Medicine, Umea University

Abstract

Abstract Background and Purpose. It is unknown how cognitive impairment affects the reliability of Timed “Up & Go” Test (TUG) scores. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expected variability of TUG scores in older subjects dependent in activities of daily living (ADL) and with different levels of cognitive state. The hypothesis was that cognitive impairment would increase the variability of TUG scores. Subjects. Seventy-eight subjects with multiple impairments, dependent in ADL, and living in residential care facilities were included in this study. The subjects were 84.8±5.7 (mean±SD) years of age, and their Mini-Mental State Examination score was 18.7±5.6. Methods. The TUG assessments were performed on 3 different days. Intrarater and interrater analyses were carried out. Results. Cognitive impairment was not related to the size of the variability of TUG scores. There was a significant relationship between the variability and the time taken to perform the TUG. The intraclass correlations were greater than .90 and were similar within and between raters. In repeated measurements at the individual level, an observed value of 10 seconds was expected to vary from 7 to 15 seconds and an observed value of 40 seconds was expected to vary from 26 to 61 seconds for 95% of the observations. Discussion and Conclusion. The measurement error of a TUG assessment is substantial for a frail older person dependent in ADL, regardless of the level of cognitive function, when verbal cuing is permitted during testing. The variability increases with the time to perform the TUG. Despite high intraclass correlation coefficients, the ranges of expected variability can be wide and are similar within and between raters. Physical therapists should be aware of this variability before they interpret the TUG score for a particular individual.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference44 articles.

1. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons;Podsiadlo;J Am Geriatr Soc,1991

2. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons;J Am Geriatr Soc,2001

3. Geriatric work-up in the Nordic countries;Sletvold;Dan Med Bull,1996

4. Balance screening of an inner city older adult population;Newton;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1997

5. Attention, frailty, and falls: the effect of a manual task on basic mobility;Lundin-Olsson;J Am Geriatr Soc,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3