Affiliation:
1. St John's College, University of Cambridge, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Speech act theorists tend to hold that the illocutionary force of an utterance is determined by one interlocutor alone: either the speaker or the hearer. Yet experience tells us that the force of our utterances is not determined unilaterally. Rather, communication often feels collaborative. In this paper, I develop and defend a collaborative theory of illocutionary force, according to which the illocutionary force of an utterance is determined by an agreement reached by the speaker and the hearer. This theory, which builds upon linguistic and sociological work on adjacency pairs and conversational interaction, can accommodate the complexity of speaker intentions (which may be disjunctive, indeterminate, and/or inconsistent over time), and renders speech act theory more compatible with theories of common ground.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference59 articles.
1. Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting;Abramson;Philosophical Perspectives,2014
2. An Alternative Model and Ideology of Communication for an Alternative to Politeness Theory;Arundale;Pragmatics,1999
3. Against (Gricean) Intentions at the Heart of Human Interaction;Intercultural Pragmatics,2008
4. Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement;Journal of Pragmatics,2010
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献