Effect of hemodiafiltration on measured physical activity: primary results of the HDFIT randomized controlled trial

Author:

Pecoits-Filho Roberto1ORCID,Larkin John12ORCID,Poli-de-Figueiredo Carlos Eduardo3,Cuvello-Neto Américo Lourenço4,Barra Ana Beatriz Lesqueves5,Gonçalves Priscila Bezerra1,Sheth Shimul6,Guedes Murilo1,Han Maggie16,Calice-Silva Viviane7,de Castro Manuel Carlos Martins8,Kotanko Peter69,de Moraes Thyago Proenca1,Raimann Jochen G6ORCID,Canziani Maria Eugenia F10,

Affiliation:

1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

2. Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office, Waltham, MA, USA

3. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

4. Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

5. Fresenius Medical Care, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

6. Renal Research Institute, New York, NY, USA

7. Fundação Pró Rim, Joinville, SC, Brazil

8. Instituto de Nefrologia de Taubaté, Taubaté, SP, Brazil

9. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

10. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Background Dialysis patients are typically inactive and their physical activity (PA) decreases over time. Uremic toxicity has been suggested as a potential causal factor of low PA in dialysis patients. Post-dilution high-volume online hemodiafiltration (HDF) provides greater higher molecular weight removal and studies suggest better clinical/patient-reported outcomes compared with hemodialysis (HD). Methods HDFIT was a randomized controlled trial at 13 clinics in Brazil that aimed to investigate the effects of HDF on measured PA (step counts) as a primary outcome. Stable HD patients (vintage 3–24 months) were randomized to receive HDF or high-flux HD. Treatment effect of HDF on the primary outcome from baseline to 3 and 6 months was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model. Results We randomized 195 patients (HDF 97; HD 98) between August 2016 and October 2017. Despite the achievement of a high convective volume in the majority of sessions and a positive impact on solute removal, the treatment effect HDF on the primary outcome was +538 [95% confidence interval (CI) −330 to 1407] steps/24 h after dialysis compared with HD, and was not statistically significant. Despite a lack of statistical significance, the observed size of the treatment effect was modest and driven by steps taken between 1.5 and 24.0 h after dialysis, in particular between 20 and 24 h (+197 steps; 95% CI −95 to 488). Conclusions HDF did not have a statistically significant treatment effect on PA 24 h following dialysis, albeit effect sizes may be clinically meaningful and deserve further investigation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3