Affiliation:
1. University of California , Santa Barbara, United States
Abstract
Abstract
We provide evidence for a bias that we call “representative signal distortion” (RSD), which is particularly relevant to settings of statistical discrimination. Experimental subjects distort their evaluation of new evidence on individual group members and interpret such information to be more representative of the group to which the individual belongs (relative to a reference group) than it really is. This produces a discriminatory gap in the evaluation of members of the two groups. Because it is driven by representativeness, the bias (and the discriminatory gap) disappears when subjects are prevented from contrasting different groups; because it is a bias in the interpretation of information, it disappears when subjects receive information before learning of the individual’s group. We show that this bias can be easily estimated from appropriately constructed data sets and can be distinguished from previously documented inferential biases in the literature. Importantly, we document how removing the bias produces a kind of free lunch in reducing discrimination, making it possible to significantly reduce discrimination without lowering accuracy of inferences.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference66 articles.
1. “Ban the Box, Criminal Records, and Racial Discrimination: A Field Experiment,”;Agan;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2018
2. “Salary History and Employer Demand: Evidence from a Two-Sided Audit,”;Agan,2021
3. “Racial Bias in Bail Decisions,”;Arnold;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2018
4. “‘No More Credit Score’: Employer Credit Check Bans and Signal Substitution,”;Ballance;Labour Economics,2020
5. “Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment,”;Barron
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献