Affiliation:
1. Geneva Graduate Institute , Switzerland
2. London School of Economics , United Kingdom
3. Yale University , United States
Abstract
AbstractWe study differences in markups earned by Bangladeshi garment exporters across buyers with different sourcing strategies and make three contributions. First, we distinguish buyers with a relational versus a spot sourcing strategy and show that a buyer’s sourcing strategy is correlated across products and origins. Buyer fixed effects explain most of the variation in sourcing strategies, suggesting that these depend on organizational capabilities. Second, we use novel data that match quantities and prices of the two main variable inputs in the production of garments (fabric and labor on sewing lines) to specific export orders. We derive conditions under which these data allow measurement of within exporter-product-time differences in markups across orders produced for different buyers. Third, we show that exporters earn higher markups on otherwise identical orders produced for relational, as opposed to spot, buyers. A sourcing model with imperfect contract enforcement, idiosyncratic shocks to exporters, and buyers that adopt different sourcing strategies trading off higher prices and reliable supply rationalizes this and other observed facts in the industry. We discuss alternative explanations and policy implications.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference79 articles.
1. “Good Jobs versus Bad Jobs,”;Acemoglu;Journal of Labor Economics,2001
2. No Line Left Behind: Assortative Matching Inside the Firm
3. “The Effects of Joining Multinational Supply Chains: New Evidence from Firm-to-Firm Linkages,”;Alfaro-Ureña;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2022
4. “Cooperation and Punishment in Regulating Labor Standards: Evidence from the Gap Inc Supply Chain,”;Amengual,2019
5. “Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure,”;Antràs;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献