Affiliation:
1. Duke University , United States
2. University of British Columbia , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
Close-kin marriage, by sustaining tightly knit family structures, may impede development. We find support for this hypothesis using U.S. state bans on cousin marriage. Our measure of cousin marriage comes from the excess frequency of same-surname marriages, a method borrowed from population genetics that we apply to millions of marriage records from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. Using census data, we first show that married cousins are more rural and have lower-paying occupations. We then turn to an event study analysis to understand how cousin marriage bans affected outcomes for treated birth cohorts. We find that these bans led individuals from families with high rates of cousin marriage to migrate off farms and into urban areas. They also gradually shift to higher-paying occupations. We observe increased dispersion, with individuals from these families living in a wider range of locations and adopting more diverse occupations. Our findings suggest that these changes were driven by the social and cultural effects of dispersed family ties rather than genetics. Notably, the bans also caused more people to live in institutional settings for the elderly, infirm, or destitute, suggesting weaker support from kin.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference96 articles.
1. Kinship, Fractionalization and Corruption;Akbari;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2019
2. The Power of the Family;Alesina;Journal of Economic Growth,2010
3. Family Ties;Alesina,2014
4. Family Networks and School Enrolment: Evidence from a Randomized Social Experiment;Angelucci;Journal of Public Economics,2010
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献