Affiliation:
1. University of Delaware , United States
Abstract
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of graphs in empirical research, little is known about readers’ ability to process the statistical information they are meant to convey (“visual inference”). We study visual inference in the context of regression discontinuity (RD) designs by measuring how accurately readers identify discontinuities in graphs produced from data-generating processes calibrated on 11 published papers from leading economics journals. First, we assess the effects of different graphical representation methods on visual inference using randomized experiments. We find that bin widths and fit lines have the largest effects on whether participants correctly perceive the presence or absence of a discontinuity. Our experimental results allow us to make evidence-based recommendations to practitioners, and we suggest using small bins with no fit lines as a starting point to construct RD graphs. Second, we compare visual inference on graphs constructed using our preferred method with widely used econometric inference procedures. We find that visual inference achieves similar or lower type I error (false positive) rates and complements econometric inference.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference58 articles.
1. “A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables;Agresti;Statistical Science,1992
2. “Transparency in Structural Research;Andrews;Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,2020
3. “A Model of Scientific Communication;Andrews;Econometrica,2021
4. “Using Maimonides’ Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement;Angrist;Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999
5. “Wanna Get Away? Regression Discontinuity Estimation of Exam School Effects Away from the Cutoff;Angrist;Journal of the American Statistical Association,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献