Abstract
Any observer of the practice of the International Court of Justice (hereafter the ICJ or the Court) may have noticed the growing tendency of the United Nations judicial body to formulate recommendations to the parties that have appeared before it. Indeed, the Court is more and more inclined to recommend that the parties allay their dispute and alleviate all ensuing human sufferings. This leaning is particularly observable when the Court simultaneously dismisses a request for the indication of provisional measures. For instance, in the recent order rendered by the Court in the case concerning theArmed Activities on the Territory of Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Rwanda), the Court made the following declaration:
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference98 articles.
1. ICJ Reports (2000).
2. ICJ Reports (1986) para 41.
3. On the heels of the Aegan Sea Continental Shelf case, the Security Council adopted resolution 395 (1976)
4. ICJ Reports (1984), order, 433, para 93.
5. ICJ Reports (1984), order, 397, 434, para 95.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Judgments Ultra Petita?;The International Court of Justice;2014