II. Legality Of Use Of Force (Serbia And Montenegro v Belgium) (Serbia And Montenegro v Canada) (Serbia And Montenegro v France) (Serbia And Montenegro v Germany) (Serbia And Montenegro v Italy) (Serbia And Montenegro v Netherlands) (Serbia And Montenegro v Portugal) (Serbia And Montenegro v United Kingdom): Preliminary Objections. Judgment Of 15 December 20041

Author:

Gray Christine

Abstract

This is a surprising-and disquieting-judgment which raises serious questions about the role of the Court. The Legality of Use of Force cases began in 1999 when the Federal Republic ofYugoslavia (FRY)2 first brought an action against ten NATOStates for their use of force in Kosovo.3 In December 2004 the Court decided unanimously that it had no jurisdiction to decide the cases. However, this unanimity masked a fundamental disagreement between the judges: it is apparent from the Joint Declaration of Judges Ranjeva, Guillaume, Higgins, Kooijmans, Al-Khasawneh, Buergenthal and Elaraby that the judges were strongly divided, by eight to seven, on the reasoning which led them to agree that there was no jurisdiction.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference34 articles.

1. Judge Elaraby in his Separate Opinion (Section HI) differed on this interpretation of Art 35(2).

2. Judge Higgins, Separate Opinion at para 18.

3. Joint Declaration at para 11.

4. Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v Belgium) Preliminary Objections, at para 80.

5. Joint Declaration at para 12. Judge Higgins (Separate Opinion, para 19) and Judge Kooijmans (Separate Opinion, paras 4–5) also expressed doubts about the Court's reasoning on this crucial point. Judge Elaraby in his Separate Opinion argued that the FRY had in fact been a member of the UN in 1999.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Kosovo’s Long Road to Independence in 2008;Self-Determination and Humanitarian Secession in International Law of a Globalized World;2017

2. The Legality of the Secessions of Kosovo and Crimea;Self-Determination and Humanitarian Secession in International Law of a Globalized World;2017

3. I. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro);International and Comparative Law Quarterly;2007-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3