Comparison of microbial diversity during two different wine fermentation processes

Author:

Böhmer Miroslav12ORCID,Smoľak Dávid13,Ženišová Katarína4,Čaplová Zuzana4,Pangallo Domenico5,Puškárová Andrea5,Bučková Mária5,Cabicarová Tereza5,Budiš Jaroslav236,Šoltýs Katarína12,Rusňáková Diana13,Kuchta Tomáš4,Szemes Tomáš123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia

2. Science park, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 8, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia

3. Geneton Ltd., 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia

4. Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Food Research Institute, National Agricultural and Food Centre, Priemyselná 4, 824 75 Bratislava, Slovakia

5. Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 21, 845 51 Bratislava, Slovakia

6. Slovak Centre of Scientific and Technical Information, Lamačská cesta 8/A, 811 04 Bratislava, Slovakia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wine production is a complex procedure in which an important role is played by many microorganisms, particularly yeasts and bacteria. In modern wineries, alcoholic fermentation is usually carried out by adding microbial starter cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for precisely controlled production. Nowadays, in the Slovak Republic, autochthonous vinification is getting more popular. The present article deals with the comparison of two vinification approaches, namely spontaneous fermentation and fermentation controlled by a standard commercial S. cerevisiae starter, from the point of view of microbiota dynamics and the chemical characteristics of the wines produced. The dynamics of microbial populations were determined during the fermentation process by a 16S and 28S rRNA next-generation sequencing approach. A profile of the volatile compounds during these fermentation processes was identified by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In summary, the microbial diversity in the m1 phase (initial must) was higher, despite the presence of the starter culture. In the m3 phase (young wine), the microbiome profiles of both batches were very similar. It seems that the crucial phase in order to study the relationship of the microbiome and the resulting product should be based on the m2 phase (fermented must), where the differences between the autochthonous and inoculated batches were more evident.

Funder

Slovak Research and Development Agency

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Molecular Biology,Microbiology

Reference62 articles.

1. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data;Andrews,2010

2. Rapid identification of acetic acid bacteria using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry fingerprinting;Andrés-Barrao;Syst Appl Microbiol,2013

3. Interactive optical trapping shows that confinement is a determinant of growth in a mixed yeast culture;Arneborg;FEMS Microbiol Lett,2005

4. Analysis of yeast populations during alcoholic fermentation: A six year follow-up study;Beltran;Syst Appl Microbiol,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3