Affiliation:
1. University of Warwick , UK
Abstract
AbstractMy aim in this article is to contribute to defences of working time policies by attempting to meet an objection that comes from those who condemn these measures on the alleged grounds that they reduce economic output. What is more, as I emphasize throughout, it is possible to rebut such a concern in a fashion that is consistent with the demands of liberal anti-perfectionism. In itself, this is a philosophically striking and politically significant result. However, beyond this, much of the value of my discussion lies in the details of how to meet the relevant objection, and perhaps especially in my novel liberal defence of the ideal of the stationary state.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference47 articles.
1. Contesting the Work-Spend Cycle: the Liberal Egalitarian Case against Consumerism;Arnold,2021
2. Work Hours, Work Intensity, and Work Addiction: Risks and Rewards;Burke;The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Well-Being,2008
3. Justice, Ecology and Future Generations;Caney
4. Conservative and Conservationist Sufficiency;Casal
5. Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism;Chan;Philosophy & Public Affairs,2000
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Future of the Philosophy of Work;Journal of Applied Philosophy;2024-04-09