Affiliation:
1. Freie Universität Berlin and University of the Bundeswehr Munich , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
In 2021, Germany passed the first law worldwide that regulates dilemma situations with autonomous cars. Against this background, this article investigates the permissibility of trade-offs between human lives in the context of self-driving cars. It does so by drawing on the debate about the traditional trolley problem. In contrast to most authors in the relevant literature, it argues that the debate about the trolley problem is both directly and indirectly relevant for the ethics of crashes with self-driving cars. Drawing on its direct normative relevance, the article shows that trade-offs are permissible in situations with self-driving cars that are similar to paradigmatic trolley cases. In scenarios that are unlike paradigmatic trolley cases, the debate about the trolley problem can have indirect normative relevance because it provides reasons against the use of moral theories and principles that cannot account for the trolley problem.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference55 articles.
1. Driverless Cars Are Colliding with the Creepy Trolley Problem;Achenbach;Journal of Applied Philosophy,2015
2. The Moral Machine Experiment’;Awad;Nature,2018
3. Life and Death Decisions of Autonomous Vehicles’;Bigman;Nature,2020
4. The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles;Bonnefon;Science,2016
5. Philosophers on Philosophy: The PhilPapers 2020 Survey;Bourget,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献