Initiation of knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: opportunity recognition and transfer channel choice

Author:

Huegel Matthias1ORCID,Doerr Philip23,Kalthaus Martin4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Economics and INCHER-Kassel, University of Kassel , Moenchebergstraße 17, Kassel 34109, Germany e-mail: m.huegel@uni-kassel.de

2. Department of Economics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena , Carl-Zeiß-Straße 3, Jena 07743, Germany email: philip.doerr@uni-jena.de

3. HHL DIGITAL SPACE, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management , Jahnallee 59, Leipzig 04109, Germany email: p.doerr@hhl.de

4. Department of Business & Management, Center for Integrative Innovation Management, University of Southern Denmark , Campusvej 55, Odense 5230, Denmark e-mail: mkalth@sam.sdu.dk

Abstract

Abstract Transferring knowledge and technology from academia to industry is usually understood as a process. While previous research focuses on phenomena along the process and its outcomes, the starting point of the process—the initiation of a transfer activity—remains unstudied. We conceptualize this initiation as a simultaneous recognition of a transfer opportunity and the choice of a transfer channel and provide first empirical insights into the initiation of the transfer process. We use survey data from 1149 scientists from the German state of Thuringia and their activities in science–industry collaboration, intellectual property rights, and spin-off creation. We employ seemingly unrelated regressions to account for selection and multiple channel choices in our econometric approach. Our results show a positive relationship between scientists’ different kinds of prior knowledge and the probability of recognizing a transfer opportunity. Contrary to our expectations, scientific impact reduces the likelihood of recognizing a transfer opportunity. For the choice of the transfer channel, the results show a positive relationship between choosing the spin-off channel and risk willingness, as well as basic research. Applied research increases the likelihood of choosing intellectual property rights as a channel. Furthermore, role models are positively associated with these two channels.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3