Evaluation of Discordant Results Between FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Conventional Testing in Pediatric Patients: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Ekambaram Maheswari1ORCID,Nabower Aleisha2,Rajbhandari Prabi3,Eisenberg Jaclyn4,Goodrich Nathaniel2,Ampofo Krow5,Gollehon Nathan S2,Martin Kimberly C6,Lyden Elizabeth7,Snowden Jessica8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center, Round Rock, Texas, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA

3. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron, Ohio, USA

4. Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA

7. Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska College of Public Health, Omaha, Nebraska, USA

8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background The FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel (MEP) has an 11% false-positive and 2.2% false-negative rate compared with conventional testing. We describe clinical characteristics, treatment decisions, and outcomes in children with discordant results between MEP and conventional testing. Methods We conducted a multisite review of patients ≤ 18 years with suspected central nervous system infection and positive results by MEP or conventional testing (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] culture, herpes simplex virus [HSV] polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and enterovirus [EV] PCR). Descriptive results are provided for patients with discordant results. Comparison between group 1 (MEP and CSF culture positive) and group 2 (MEP positive, CSF culture negative, or showing a different pathogen) was made by Mann-Whitney test for continuous and Fisher’s test for categorical variables. Results A total of 355 patients had at least one pathogen identified. More than half of patients with bacterial pathogens identified that are included in the MEP had discordant results (30/52; 58%). There were 28 samples with bacterial pathogen identified on MEP only, 1 with different bacterial pathogens on MEP and culture, and 1 with Escherichia coli identified on CSF culture only. Patients in group 1 were more likely to have CSF pleocytosis, elevated CSF protein, and decreased CSF glucose than group 2 (P < .05). Two patients were HSV positive by MEP while HSV negative by PCR. Ten patients had discordant results between MEP and EV PCR. Conclusions Discordant results between MEP and conventional testing are common. Treatment decisions based on a positive MEP should be made in the appropriate clinical context.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3