Machine learning to predict the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and cardiac death based on clinical risk, coronary calcium, and epicardial adipose tissue: a prospective study

Author:

Commandeur Frederic1ORCID,Slomka Piotr J2,Goeller Markus3,Chen Xi234ORCID,Cadet Sebastien2ORCID,Razipour Aryabod1,McElhinney Priscilla1ORCID,Gransar Heidi24ORCID,Cantu Stephanie24,Miller Robert J H24ORCID,Rozanski Alan5,Achenbach Stephan3,Tamarappoo Balaji K24,Berman Daniel S24,Dey Damini1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 116 N Robertson Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA

2. Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

4. Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

5. Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai St Lukes Hospital, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims Our aim was to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML), integrating clinical parameters with coronary artery calcium (CAC), and automated epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) quantification, for the prediction of long-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death in asymptomatic subjects. Methods and results Our study included 1912 asymptomatic subjects [1117 (58.4%) male, age: 55.8 ± 9.1 years] from the prospective EISNER trial with long-term follow-up after CAC scoring. EAT volume and density were quantified using a fully automated deep learning method. ML extreme gradient boosting was trained using clinical co-variates, plasma lipid panel measurements, risk factors, CAC, aortic calcium, and automated EAT measures, and validated using repeated 10-fold cross validation. During mean follow-up of 14.5 ± 2 years, 76 events of MI and/or cardiac death occurred. ML obtained a significantly higher AUC than atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and CAC score for predicting events (ML: 0.82; ASCVD: 0.77; CAC: 0.77, P < 0.05 for all). Subjects with a higher ML score (by Youden’s index) had high hazard of suffering events (HR: 10.38, P < 0.001); the relationships persisted in multivariable analysis including ASCVD-risk and CAC measures (HR: 2.94, P = 0.005). Age, ASCVD-risk, and CAC were prognostically important for both genders. Systolic blood pressure was more important than cholesterol in women, and the opposite in men. Conclusions In this prospective study, machine learning used to integrate clinical and quantitative imaging-based variables significantly improves prediction of MI and cardiac death compared with standard clinical risk assessment. Following further validation, such a personalized paradigm could potentially be used to improve cardiovascular risk assessment.

Funder

National Institute of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology

Reference44 articles.

1. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study;Arad;J Am Coll Cardiol,2005

2. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality;Shaw;Radiology,2003

3. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease;Berman;J Nucl Med,2006

4. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography;Arad;J Am Coll Cardiol,2000

5. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography;Raggi;Circulation,2000

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3