Central bankers and the rationale for unconventional monetary policies: reasserting, renouncing or recasting monetarism?

Author:

Fiebiger Brett1,Lavoie Marc2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Flinders University and University of Sorbonne Paris Nord

2. University of Ottawa

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to examine the rationale for the unconventional monetary policies adopted by central banks in response to the Global Financial Crisis. Quantitative easing appears to be a return to monetarist principles. Indeed, the Bank of England emphasised a causal chain running from increases in broad money to spending and inflation, while the Bank of Japan later pointed to a theorised relation between base money and expected inflation. Some aspects of monetarism have been renounced, albeit not necessarily with convincing reasoning. Monetarist principles can also be discerned in the ‘credit view’ associated with the research of two-term US Federal Reserve Chair, Ben Bernanke. An understanding of the banking system and the channels of monetary transmission is still a work in progress.

Funder

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference83 articles.

1. The controversial treatment of money and banks in macroeconomics;Ábel;Financial and Economic Review,2016

2. The monetary policy outcome curve: can the size and structure of public debt undermine policy objectives?,;Bell-Kelton,2006

3. Quantitative easing;Benford;Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,2009

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Studying Differing Impacts of Various Monetary Aggregates on the Real Economy;International Journal of Financial Studies;2023-12-01

2. Capital Flows and the Eurozone's North-South Divide;Politics & Society;2023-06-02

3. The contribution of MMT to modern macroeconomics;European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention;2023-05-26

4. Setting the record straight on the recovery from the 1920–1921 recession;Cambridge Journal of Economics;2023-01-18

5. Quantitative tightening;Reference Module in Social Sciences;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3