Affiliation:
1. National Scientific and Technical Research Council and IDAES, Universidad Nacional de San Martin
2. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean and IDAES, Universidad Nacional de San Martin
Abstract
Abstract
An accurate analysis of Marx’s early works reveals the pivotal role of ontology in defining his critical research project, which culminated with the publication of Capital. By re-assessing Marx’s critical project in such terms, a careful review of the ontological conceptions of contemporary heterodox economics becomes possible, revealing a paradoxical situation. By focussing exclusively on mainstream’s logical inconsistencies, a branch of heterodox economics converged towards the same ontological assumptions as mainstream economics. These economists fall into the ‘axiomatic habitus’ of mimicking, at times unconsciously, the same stances as mainstream economics. By contrast, segments of mainstream economics (new political economy and neo-institutionalist economics) are more aware of the nature of the social reality to be investigated, introducing an axiomatised history within their framework. A careful review of Karl Marx’s ontological rupture then becomes an inescapable reference in order to amend both heterodox and orthodox economics, challenging the increasing insularity of our discipline.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference58 articles.
1. Marxism against economic science: Althusser’s legacy,;Amariglio;Research in Political Economy,,1987
2. From philosophical anthropology to social ontology and back: what to do with Marx’s sixth thesis on Feuerbach?,;Balibar,2012
3. The notion of class politics in Marx,;Balibar;Rethinking Marxism,,1988
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献