Affiliation:
1. Department of Health, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Italy
2. Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences University of Naples “Federico II”, Italy
3. Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada
Abstract
Summary
Background/objectives
Whether orthodontic treatment with functional appliances improves facial aesthetics is still under debate. This study aimed to determine whether functional orthodontic treatment improves the facial attractiveness of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Materials/method
Extraoral lateral photographs of 20 children with Class I (CLI, 11.7 ± 0.8 years), and before (T1) and after treatment (T2) photographs of patients with Class II division 1 (CLII T1 and CLII T2; mean age ± SD = 11.1 ± 0.6 years) treated with functional appliances, were transformed into black silhouettes. Three panels of examiners including 30 orthodontists (39.0 ± 10.1 years), 30 dentists (40.0 ± 9.7) and 30 laypersons (39.0 ± 9.2) evaluated the attractiveness of patients’ silhouettes using a 100-mm visual analogue scale, and the sagittal position of patients’ upper lip, lower lip, and chin using a 3-point Likert scale. Two-way ANOVA and a chi-square test were used to test differences among groups. Statistically significance was set as P < 0.05.
Results
The silhouettes of CLII T2 individuals were more attractive than those of the other groups (all Ps < 0.001). The upper lip, lower lip, and the chin of these individuals were judged to be normally positioned in 69.5 per cent, 74.9 per cent, and 72.3 per cent of the assessments, respectively (all Ps < 0.05).
Limitations
This study did not account for the psychological profile of the examiners, which may have affected the ratings.
Conclusions/implications
Orthodontic treatment with functional appliances is associated with a superior facial profile attractiveness. Functional treatment should be considered as a treatment option to improve the facial appearance of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference42 articles.
1. Panel perception of facial attractiveness;Kerr;British Journal of Orthodontics,1990
2. Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Rongo;Journal of Oral Rehabilitation,2017
3. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age;McNamara;The Angle Orthodontist,1981
4. Is there an association between various aspects of oral health in Southern Italy children? An epidemiological study assessing dental decays, periodontal status, malocclusions and temporomandibular joint function;Paduano;European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry,2018
5. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians;Cochrane;The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,1999
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献