Affiliation:
1. U.S. Geological Survey, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho , 975 West 6th Street, Moscow, ID 83844 , United States
Abstract
Abstract
Female and male cooperative breeders can use different strategies to maximize reproduction and fitness over their lifetimes. Answering questions about fitness in cooperative breeders requires long-term studies as well as complete data on group composition and size which can be exceedingly difficult to obtain. Using a long-term genetic data set of complete group pedigrees, I asked how lifetime reproductive characteristics of female and male gray wolves (Canis lupus) differed. I predicted that genetic relatedness to helpers would be higher for females than males due to philopatric behavior of female wolves, group size would be similar between the sexes, females would inherit breeding positions from within groups more often than males due to differences in dispersal strategies between the sexes, males would have more lifetime mates and produce more young than females because of polygamy, and females would breed for more years than males due to the likelihood that females would still breed (with a new partner) after a mate died or was expelled from the group. I documented complete lifetime breeding histories for 11 male and 18 female wolves in Idaho, United States, 2008 to 2018. Genetic relatedness to helpers, group size, number of mates, pups, and years breeding did not differ between the sexes. Females, however, inherited breeding positions within groups far more often than males. Individuals who secured breeding positions generally reproduced for 2 seasons and commonly had more than 1 partner during their lifetimes if they were able to maintain their breeding position longer. Direct fitness varied greatly within female and male breeding wolves.
Funder
Regina Bauer Frankenberg Foundation for Animal Welfare
Bernice Barbour Foundation
Coypu Foundation
Eppley Foundation for Research
Idaho Department of Fish and Game
Kampe Foundation
Leonard X. Bosack and Bette M. Kruger Charitable Foundation
Nancy Carroll Draper Foundation
Nez Perce Tribe
Oregon Zoo Future for Wildlife
Shikar Safari Club International Foundation
Steven Leuthold Family Foundation
Mountaineers Foundation
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Wilburforce Foundation
Wolf Recovery Foundation
University of Idaho College of Natural Resources
University of Idaho Environmental Science Program
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference42 articles.
1. An efficient method for screening faecal DNA genotypes and detecting new individuals and hybrids in the Red Wolf (Canis rufus) experimental population area;Adams,2007
2. Inherit the kingdom or storm the castle? Breeding strategies in gray wolves;Ausband,2022
3. Lifetime wolf breeder data [Data set];Ausband;Zenodo,2023
4. Longevity and adaptability of a reintroduced Gray Wolf;Ausband,2009
5. Surveying predicted rendezvous sites to monitor Gray Wolf populations;Ausband,2010