Home range variation in leopards living across the human density gradient

Author:

Snider Matthew H1ORCID,Athreya Vidya R2,Balme Guy A3ORCID,Bidner Laura R4,Farhadinia Mohammed S56,Fattebert Julien78,Gompper Matthew E9,Gubbi Sanjay1011,Hunter Luke T B12,Isbell Lynne A1314,Macdonald David W15,Odden Morten16,Owen Cailey R17,Slotow Rob18,Spalton James A19,Stein Andrew B202122,Steyn Villiers23,Vanak Abi T2425,Weise Florian J26,Wilmers Christopher C27,Kays Roland28

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

2. Wildlife Conservation Society, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

3. Project Pardus, Panthera, New York, NY, USA

4. School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

5. Oxford Martin School and Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

6. Future4Leopards Foundation, Tehran, Iran

7. Center for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

8. Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA

9. Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA

10. Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore, Karnataka, India

11. Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Karnataka, India

12. Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY, USA

13. Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya

14. Department of Anthropology and Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA

15. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Tubney House, Oxfordshire, Oxford, United Kingdom

16. Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2418 Elverum, Norway

17. School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

18. School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus, Scottsville, South Africa

19. Arabian Leopard Survey, Muscat 110, Oman

20. CLAWS Conservancy, 32 Pine Tree Drive, Worcester, MA, USA

21. Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA

22. Landmark College, Putney, VT, USA

23. Vision Photography, Hoedspruit, Limpopo, South Africa

24. DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance, Hyderabad, Telengana, India

25. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

26. N/a’an ku se Research Programme, Windhoek, Namibia

27. Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

28. Biodiversity Research Lab, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA

Abstract

Abstract Home range size is a fundamental measure of animal space use, providing insight into habitat quality, animal density, and social organization. Human impacts increasingly are affecting wildlife, especially among wide-ranging species that encounter anthropogenic disturbance. Leopards (Panthera pardus) provide a useful model for studying this relationship because leopards coexist with people at high and low human densities and are sensitive to human disturbance. To compare leopard home range size across a range of human densities and other environmental conditions, we combined animal tracking data from 74 leopards in multiple studies with new analytical techniques that accommodate different sampling regimes. We predicted that home ranges would be smaller in more productive habitats and areas of higher human population density due to possible linkage with leopard prey subsidies from domestic species. We also predicted that male leopards would have larger home ranges than those of females. Home ranges varied in size from 14.5 km2 in India to 885.6 km2 in Namibia, representing a 60-fold magnitude of variation. Home range stability was evident for 95.2% of nontranslocated individuals and 38.5% of translocated individuals. Leopard home range sizes were negatively correlated with landscape productivity, and males used larger areas than females. Leopards in open habitats had a predicted negative correlation in home range size with human population density, but leopards in closed habitats used larger home ranges in areas with more people.

Funder

Iranian Department of Environment

Kenya Wildlife Service

Karnataka Forest Department

People’s Trust for Endangered Species

Panthera

Zoologische Gesellschaft für Arten-und Populationsschutz

Iranian Cheetah Society

Quagga Conservation Fund

IdeaWild

Association Francaise des Parcs Zoologiques

Mpala Research Centre

National Science Foundation

L.S.B. Leakey Foundation

Wenner-Gren Foundation

National Geographic Society

Chester Zoo

EKZNW

Afrika Timbo Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3