Affiliation:
1. Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
2. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
3. Mammals Research Section, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO, USA
4. National Park Service Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Foraging behavior underpins many ecological processes; however, robust assessments of this behavior for free-ranging animals are rare due to limitations to direct observations. We leveraged acoustic monitoring and GPS tracking to assess the factors influencing foraging behavior of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). We deployed custom-built acoustic collars with GPS radiocollars on mule deer to measure location-specific foraging. We quantified individual bites and steps taken by deer, and quantified two metrics of foraging behavior: the number of bites taken per step and the number of bites taken per unit time, which relate to foraging intensity and efficiency. We fit statistical models to these metrics to examine the individual, environmental, and anthropogenic factors influencing foraging. Deer in poorer body condition took more bites per step and per minute and foraged for longer irrespective of landscape properties. Other patterns varied seasonally with major changes in deer condition. In December, when deer were in better condition, they took fewer bites per step and more bites per minute. Deer also foraged more intensely and efficiently in areas of greater forage availability and greater movement costs. During March, when deer were in poorer condition, foraging was not influenced by landscape features. Anthropogenic factors weakly structured foraging behavior in December with no relationship in March. Most research on animal foraging is interpreted under the framework of optimal foraging theory. Departures from predictions developed under this framework provide insight to unrecognized factors influencing the evolution of foraging. Our results only conformed to our predictions when deer were in better condition and ecological conditions were declining, suggesting foraging strategies were state-dependent. These results advance our understanding of foraging patterns in wild animals and highlight novel observational approaches for studying animal behavior.
Funder
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
U.S. National Park Service Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division
U.S. Bureau of Land Management
ExxonMobil Production/XTO Energy
Williams Exploration & Production
EnCana Corporation
Mule Deer Foundation
Colorado Mule Deer Association
Safari Club International
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration
Marathon Oil Corporation
Shell Exploration and Production
Colorado State Severance Tax Fund
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Piceance Basin land owners
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference50 articles.
1. Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer;Altendorf;Journal of Mammalogy,2001
2. Composition and quality of mule deer diets on pinyon-juniper winter range, Colorado;Bartmann;Journal of Range Management,1983
3. Variation in ungulate body fat: individual versus temporal effects;Bergman;Journal of Wildlife Management,2018
4. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk;Brown;Evolutionary Ecology Research,1999
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献