Questioning the definition of Tourette syndrome—evidence from machine learning

Author:

Paulus Theresa12,Schappert Ronja1,Bluschke Annet34,Alvarez-Fischer Daniel1ORCID,Naumann Kim Ezra Robin34,Roessner Veit3,Bäumer Tobias1,Beste Christian345ORCID,Münchau Alexander1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Systems Motor Science, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany

2. Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany

3. Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

4. Faculty of Medicine, University Neuropsychology Centre, TU Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

5. Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Qianfoshan Campus, No. 88 East Wenhua Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250014, China

Abstract

Abstract Tics in Tourette syndrome are often difficult to discern from single spontaneous movements or vocalizations in healthy people. In this study, videos of patients with Tourette syndrome and healthy controls were taken and independently scored according to the Modified Rush Videotape Rating Scale. We included n = 101 patients with Tourette syndrome (71 males, 30 females, mean age 17.36 years ± 10.46 standard deviation) and n = 109 healthy controls (57 males, 52 females, mean age 17.62 years ± 8.78 standard deviation) in a machine learning-based analysis. The results showed that the severity of motor tics, but not vocal phenomena, is the best predictor to separate and classify patients with Tourette syndrome and healthy controls. This finding questions the validity of current diagnostic criteria for Tourette syndrome requiring the presence of both motor and vocal tics. In addition, the negligible importance of vocalizations has implications for medical practice, because current recommendations for Tourette syndrome probably also apply to the large group with chronic motor tic disorders.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3