Protocol for multicentre comparison of interictal high-frequency oscillations as a predictor of seizure freedom

Author:

Dimakopoulos Vasileios1ORCID,Gotman Jean2,Stacey William3ORCID,von Ellenrieder Nicolás2,Jacobs Julia4,Papadelis Christos5ORCID,Cimbalnik Jan6,Worrell Gregory7,Sperling Michael R8,Zijlmans Maike9,Imbach Lucas10,Frauscher Birgit2,Sarnthein Johannes1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Klinik für Neurochirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich , Zürich, Switzerland

2. Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, McGill University , Montreal, Quebec , Canada

3. Department of Neurology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, MI , USA

4. Alberta Children’s Hospital, University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada

5. Cook Children’s Health Care System , Fort Worth, TX , USA

6. St. Anne’s University Hospital , Brno , Czech Republic

7. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA

8. Department of Neurology, Jefferson University Hospitals , Philadelphia, PA , USA

9. University Medical Center, Utrecht, and Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN) , Utrecht, The Netherlands

10. Schweizerisches Epilepsie Zentrum , Zurich , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract In drug-resistant focal epilepsy, interictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) recorded from intracranial EEG (iEEG) may provide clinical information for delineating epileptogenic brain tissue. The iEEG electrode contacts that contain HFO are hypothesized to delineate the epileptogenic zone; their resection should then lead to postsurgical seizure freedom. We test whether our prospective definition of clinically relevant HFO is in agreement with postsurgical seizure outcome. The algorithm is fully automated and is equally applied to all data sets. The aim is to assess the reliability of the proposed detector and analysis approach. We use an automated data-independent prospective definition of clinically relevant HFO that has been validated in data from two independent epilepsy centres. In this study, we combine retrospectively collected data sets from nine independent epilepsy centres. The analysis is blinded to clinical outcome. We use iEEG recordings during NREM sleep with a minimum of 12 epochs of 5 min of NREM sleep. We automatically detect HFO in the ripple (80–250 Hz) and in the fast ripple (250–500 Hz) band. There is no manual rejection of events in this fully automated algorithm. The type of HFO that we consider clinically relevant is defined as the simultaneous occurrence of a fast ripple and a ripple. We calculate the temporal consistency of each patient’s HFO rates over several data epochs within and between nights. Patients with temporal consistency <50% are excluded from further analysis. We determine whether all electrode contacts with high HFO rate are included in the resection volume and whether seizure freedom (ILAE 1) was achieved at ≥2 years follow-up. Applying a previously validated algorithm to a large cohort from several independent epilepsy centres may advance the clinical relevance and the generalizability of HFO analysis as essential next step for use of HFO in clinical practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3