Probabilistic landscape of seizure semiology localizing values

Author:

Alim-Marvasti Ali1234ORCID,Romagnoli Gloria145,Dahele Karan6,Modarres Hadi7,Pérez-García Fernando238,Sparks Rachel8,Ourselin Sébastien8,Clarkson Matthew J.23,Chowdhury Fahmida14,Diehl Beate14,Duncan John S.14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL , London, UK

2. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL , London, UK

3. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) , London, UK

4. National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery , London, UK

5. Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK

6. University College London Medical School , London, UK

7. Faculty of Engineering, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK

8. School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London , London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Semiology describes the evolution of symptoms and signs during epileptic seizures and contributes to the evaluation of individuals with focal drug-resistant epilepsy for curative resection. Semiology varies in complexity from elementary sensorimotor seizures arising from primary cortex to complex behaviours and automatisms emerging from distributed cerebral networks. Detailed semiology interpreted by expert epileptologists may point towards the likely site of seizure onset, but this process is subjective. No study has captured the variances in semiological localizing values in a data-driven manner to allow objective and probabilistic determinations of implicated networks and nodes. We curated an open data set from the epilepsy literature, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, linking semiology to hierarchical brain localizations. A total of 11 230 data points were collected from 4643 patients across 309 articles, labelled using ground truths (postoperative seizure-freedom, concordance of imaging and neurophysiology, and/or invasive EEG) and a designation method that distinguished between semiologies arising from a predefined cortical region and descriptions of neuroanatomical localizations responsible for generating a particular semiology. This allowed us to mitigate temporal lobe publication bias by filtering studies that preselected patients based on prior knowledge of their seizure foci. Using this data set, we describe the probabilistic landscape of semiological localizing values as forest plots at the resolution of seven major brain regions: temporal, frontal, cingulate, parietal, occipital, insula, and hypothalamus, and five temporal subregions. We evaluated the intrinsic value of any one semiology over all other ictal manifestations. For example, epigastric auras implicated the temporal lobe with 83% probability when not accounting for the publication bias that favoured temporal lobe epilepsies. Unbiased results for a prior distribution of cortical localizations revised the prevalence of temporal lobe epilepsies from 66% to 44%. Therefore, knowledge about the presence of epigastric auras updates localization to the temporal lobe with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.4 [CI95% (1.9, 2.9); and specifically, mesial temporal structures OR: 2.8 (2.3, 2.9)], attesting the value of epigastric auras. As a further example, although head version is thought to implicate the frontal lobes, it did not add localizing value compared with the prior distribution of cortical localizations [OR: 0.9 (0.7, 1.2)]. Objectification of the localizing values of the 12 most common semiologies provides a complementary view of brain dysfunction to that of lesion-deficit mappings, as instead of linking brain regions to phenotypic-deficits, semiological phenotypes are linked back to brain sources. This work enables coupling of seizure propagation with ictal manifestations, and clinical support algorithms for localizing seizure phenotypes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference52 articles.

1. Are the dichotomies generalized versus focal epilepsies and idiopathic versus symptomatic epilepsies still valid in modern epileptology?;Lüders;Epilepsia,2009

2. Side-to-side axial movements. Adding a new sign to the asymmetry of the clonic phase and asymmetric seizure termination in differentiating primary and secondarily generalised tonic-clonic seizures;Franca;Epileptic Disord,2014

3. Classification of paroxysmal events and the four-dimensional epilepsy classification system;Lüders;Epileptic Disorders,2019

4. Adult epilepsy;Duncan;Lancet,2006

5. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE commission for classification and terminology;Scheffer;Epilepsia,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3