Nerve conduction features may serve as a diagnostic clue for neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease

Abstract

Abstract Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease is a neurodegenerative disorder with a wide phenotypic spectrum, including peripheral neuropathy. This study aims to characterize the nerve conduction features and proposes an electrophysiological criterion to assist the diagnosis of neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease. In this study, nerve conduction studies were performed in 50 genetically confirmed neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease patients, 200 age- and sex-matched healthy controls and 40 patients with genetically unsolved leukoencephalopathy. Abnormal electrophysiological parameters were defined as mean values plus or minus two standardized deviations of the healthy controls or failure to evoke a response on the examined nerves. Compared to controls, neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease patients had significantly slower motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities, as well as lower amplitudes of compound motor action potentials and sensory nerve action potentials in all tested nerves (P < 0.05). Forty-eight of the 50 neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease patients (96%) had at least one abnormal electrophysiological parameter, with slowing of motor nerve conduction velocities being the most prevalent characteristic. The motor nerve conduction velocities of median, ulnar, peroneal and tibial nerves were 44.2 ± 5.5, 45.3 ± 6.1, 37.3 ± 5.3 and 35.6 ± 5.1 m/s, respectively, which were 12.4–13.6 m/s slower than those of the controls. The electrophysiological features were similar between neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease patients manifesting with CNS symptoms and those with PNS-predominant presentations. Thirteen of the 14 patients (93%) who underwent nerve conduction study within the first year of symptom onset exhibited abnormal findings, indicating that clinical or subclinical peripheral neuropathy is an early disease marker of neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease. We then assessed the feasibility of using motor nerve conduction velocity as a diagnostic tool of neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease and evaluated the diagnostic performance of various combinations of nerve conduction parameters using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The criterion of having at least two nerves with motor nerve conduction velocity ranging from 35 to 50 m/s in median/ulnar nerves and 30–40 m/s in tibial/peroneal nerves demonstrated high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (99%), with an area under the curve of 0.95, to distinguish neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease patients from healthy controls. The criterion’s diagnostic performance was validated on an independent cohort of 56 literature reported neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease cases (area under the curve = 0.93, sensitivity = 87.5%, specificity = 99.0%), and in distinguishing neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease from genetically unresolved leukoencephalopathy cases (sensitivity = 90.0%, specificity = 80.0%). In conclusion, mildly to moderately decreased motor nerve conduction velocity in multiple nerves is a significant electrophysiological hallmark assisting the diagnosis of neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease, regardless of CNS- or PNS-predominant manifestations.