Affiliation:
1. Division of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Aichi Gakuin University , Nisshin , Japan
2. Research Center for Integrative Evolutionary Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI , Hayama , Japan
Abstract
Abstract
Some taxa of mammals live in water, all of which evolved from land-dwelling ancestors. In the family Mustelidae (Mammalia: Carnivora), most species live on land, while otters, comprising the subfamily Lutrinae, inhabit aquatic environments, which include the almost exclusively aquatic sea otters (Enhydra lutris). Thus, the transition from a terrestrial to an aquatic lifestyle has occurred within this family. Despite potentially different selection pressures on body size in aquatic and terrestrial habitats, no divergence in the evolutionary pattern of body size between otters and other mustelids has previously been shown using models of trait evolution on a phylogeny. We applied models that explicitly incorporated lineage-specific directional selection to the evolution of body mass in living mustelids. Using a simulation-based likelihood and approximate Bayesian computation approach, we demonstrated lineage-specific directional selection for larger body mass in otters, which is distinct from other mustelids. There was no evidence of a difference between sea otters and other otters in the strength of directional selection for larger body mass. Additionally, our analyses supported no difference in the rate at which body mass evolves in both directions between otters and other mustelids. These findings suggest that the evolution of body mass in otters is associated with selective advantages of larger size rather than the relaxation of constraints on body size in aquatic habitats, like other aquatic mammals such as sirenians, cetaceans, and pinnipeds.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference68 articles.
1. Lower size limit of aquatic mammals;Ahlborn;American Journal of Physics,1999
2. Cope’s rule and the adaptive landscape of dinosaur body size evolution;Benson;Palaeontology,2018
3. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution;Butler;The American Naturalist,2004
4. Cope’s rule and the evolution of body size in Pinnipedimorpha (Mammalia: Carnivora);Churchill,2015