Affiliation:
1. Corcoran Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4780, U.S.A
Abstract
Abstract
Non-well-founded set theories allow set-theoretic exotica that standard ZFC will not, such as a set that has itself as its sole member. We distinguish plenitudinous non-well-founded set theories, such as Boffa set theory, that allow infinitely many such sets, from restrictive theories, such as Finsler–Aczel or AFA, that allow exactly one. Plenitudinous non-well-founded set theories face a puzzle: nothing seems to explain the identity or distinctness of various of the sets they countenance. I aim to sharpen this puzzle, make clear who it does and does not apply to, and to argue in favor of a plenitudinous theory like Boffa.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference22 articles.
1. Hypersets;Barwise;The Mathematical Intelligencer,1991
2. ‘Spatio-temporal coincidence and the grounding problem’;Bennett;Philosophical Studies,2004
3. ‘The identity of indiscernibles’;Black;Mind,1952
4. ‘Viciousness and the structure of reality’;Bliss;Philosophical Studies,2013