Effectiveness of digital health interventions for perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Anyanwu Ifunanya Stellamaris12ORCID,Jenkins Judy12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Informatics , Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Life Sciences, , Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom

2. Swansea University , Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Life Sciences, , Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Pregnant women and new mothers within 1 year after delivery are at a high risk of depression, yet many do not get the help they need due to wide reasons heralding stigma, access, cost, time, and shortage of human resources. Hence, compelling the exploration of alternate and potentially cost-effective means of delivering care, including the leverage of digital tools. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital health interventions in reducing depressive symptoms among perinatal women. Literatures were sought from seven academic databases alongside the references of previous reviews. Included studies were all quantitative study types involving the use of digital health interventions for perinatal women not more than 1-year post-delivery. Standardized mean difference and standard error were used to perform random-effect model meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to determine certainty and modifiers of the findings, respectively. Forty-eight studies were included in this review with 28 studies used for meta-analyses. Numerous digital channels were identified; however, none specified the use of a digital health theory in its development. The digital health interventions showed a small positive significant effect over the controls (standardized mean difference = 0.29, P = 0.003, I2 = 34%), and this was significantly influenced by intervention delivery and facilitation modes, time of initiation of the intervention, and period covered by the intervention. Although digital health interventions may hold some potential for perinatal depression, scaling the interventions may be challenging sequel to overlooked influences from the interactions within the human–computer–society complex.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3