Affiliation:
1. Hebrew University of Jerusalem , IL
Abstract
Abstract
The transgenerational community is based on moral similarity between contemporary and future people, referring to an ongoing moral deliberation across generations. It justifies obligations of justice towards the not yet born. Prioritarianism gives extra weight to the wellbeing of the least advantaged. I argue that both sentiments are egalitarian, and ask whether there is any tension between them. If we assume economic growth, and/or technological improvements and/or inflation, then prioritarianism prima facie implies that we should prefer to spend any dollar on today’s disadvantaged than on future generations, hence is in tension with the demands of the transgenerational community. Analyzing four ways of meeting this challenge, I argue that the two principles are not in tension.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference36 articles.
1. “Prioritarianism and Climate Change,”;Adler;Environmental Resource Economics,2015
2. “Future Generations: A Prioritarian View,”;Adler;George Washington Law Review,2009
3. A Philosophy for Future Generations
4. “Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism,”;Arneson;Ethics,2000