Experiences of Patient-Led Chronic Pain Peer Support Groups After Pain Management Programs: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Farr Michelle12ORCID,Brant Heather12ORCID,Patel Rita12,Linton Myles-Jay12,Ambler Nicholas3,Vyas Sareeta34,Wedge Hannah35,Watkins Sue3,Horwood Jeremy12

Affiliation:

1. The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, UK

2. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

3. Pain Management Service, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

4. Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Cathedral Court, Sheffield, UK

5. Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and the impacts of peer support groups that patients maintained after UK NHS group pain management programs (PMPs). Design Long-term impacts of group PMPs remain unclear, with indications that positive effects can fade. We evaluated a model of continued peer support, co-produced by patients and clinicians, to maintain the therapeutic impact of PMP groups. A protocol was implemented that encouraged patients to continue to meet in their established PMP group for patient-led peer support (without clinical input) after PMPs finished. Peer support aimed to consolidate self-management, and advance social life recovery. We examined the impacts that groups had on attendees, and why some dropped out. Methods Semi-structured interviews with 38 patients and 7 clinicians, analyzed thematically. Results Friendship bonds and mutual understandings of effective ways of coping with pain encouraged participants to maintain recovery following PMPs. After PMP professional involvement has ended, these meetings enabled patients to develop greater agency from the shared sense of helping bring about new achievements or averting setbacks. Peer support extended the understanding of what is possible when living with pain. However, continuing meetings were not right for all. Reasons for not attending included lack of connection with peers. Conclusions Co-produced peer support groups after PMPs can be a low-cost, effective social intervention, providing emotional, practical and social benefits, with improved self-management skills, stronger social connections and some reduced use of health services. Project resources for developing peer support meetings after PMPs are freely available online.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West

NIHR

Department of Health and Social Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3