Prognostic value of shock index in patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ARIC study community surveillance

Author:

Chunawala Zainali S1,Hall Michael E2,Arora Sameer3,Dai Xuming4,Menon Venu5,Smith Sidney C3,Matsushita Kunihiro6ORCID,Caughey Melissa C7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA

2. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St., Jackson, MS, 39216, USA

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 160 Dental Circle, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA

4. Department of Cardiology, Lang Research Center, New York Presbyterian Queens Hospital, 56-45 Main St., Flushing, NY, 11355, USA

5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

6. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2024 E. Monument St., Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

7. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, 104 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims Shock index (SI), defined as the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP), is easily obtained and predictive of mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, large-scale evaluations of SI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are lacking. Methods and results Hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction were sampled from four US areas by the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and classified by physician review. Shock index was derived from the HR and SBP at first presentation and considered high when ≥0.7. From 2000 to 2014, 18 301 weighted hospitalizations for NSTEMI were sampled and had vitals successfully obtained. Of these, 5753 (31%) had high SI (≥0.7). Patients with high SI were more often female (46% vs. 39%) and had more prevalent chronic kidney disease (40% vs. 32%). TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) risk scores were similar between the groups (4.3 vs. 4.2), but GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome) score was higher with high SI (140 vs. 118). Angiography, revascularization, and guideline-directed medications were less often administered to patients with high SI, and the 28-day mortality was higher (13% vs. 5%). Prediction of 28-day mortality by SI as a continuous measurement [area under the curve (AUC): 0.68] was intermediate to that of the GRACE score (AUC: 0.87) and the TIMI score (AUC: 0.54). After adjustments, patients with high SI had twice the odds of 28-day mortality (odds ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.46–2.80). Conclusion The SI is easily obtainable, performs moderately well as a predictor of short-term mortality in patients hospitalized with NSTEMI, and may be useful for risk stratification in emergency settings.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institutes of Health

Department of Health and Human Services

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Value of shock index in prognosticating the short-term outcome of death for patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department;Yussof;Med J Malaysia,2012

2. Prognostic value of shock index in children with septic shock;Rousseaux;Pediatr Emerg Care,2013

3. Are shock index and adjusted shock index useful in predicting mortality and length of stay in community-acquired pneumonia?;Sankaran;Eur J Intern Med,2011

4. Usefulness of shock index and adjusted shock index in the severity assessment of community-acquired pneumonia;Myint;Respiration,2009

5. Prognostic value of the shock index along with transthoracic echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism;Toosi;Am J Cardiol,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3