Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices

Published:2021-05-01 Issue:5 Volume:10 Page:570-583
ISSN:2048-8726
Container-title:European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Chieffo Alaide¹^ORCID,Dudek Dariusz²,Hassager Christian³^ORCID,Combes Alain⁴^ORCID,Gramegna Mario⁵^ORCID,Halvorsen Sigrun⁶^ORCID,Huber Kurt⁷^ORCID,Kunadian Vijay⁸^ORCID,Maly Jiri⁹^ORCID,Møller Jacob Eifer¹⁰^ORCID,Pappalardo Federico¹¹,Tarantini Giuseppe¹²^ORCID,Tavazzi Guido¹³^ORCID,Thiele Holger¹⁴^ORCID,Vandenbriele Christophe¹⁵¹⁶^ORCID,van Mieghem Nicolas¹⁷^ORCID,Vranckx Pascal¹⁸,Werner Nikos¹⁹,Price Susanna¹⁶

Affiliation:

1. Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

2. Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland and Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy

3. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

4. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, and Department of Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cardiology Institute, Pitieé Salpeêtrieère Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University Medical School, F-75013 Paris, France

5. Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy

6. Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål and University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway

7. 3rd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminenhospital, Montleartstrasse 37, A-1160 Vienna, and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Freudplatz 3, A-1020 Vienna, Austria

8. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University and Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom

9. Cardiac Center, IKEM Prague, Videnska 1958/9, 14021 Prague 4, Czech Republic

10. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

11. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS ISMETT, UPMC Italy, Via Ernesto Triconi 5, 94100 Palermo, Italy

12. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy

13. Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Piazzale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy

14. Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Struempellstr 30, 04289 Leipzig, Germany

15. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

16. Department of Adult Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, SW3 6NP London, UK

17. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands

18. Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium, and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences University of Hasselt Martelarenplein 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium

19. Heart Center Trier, Department of Internal Medicine III, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Nordallee 1, 54292 Trier, Germany

Abstract

Abstract There has been a significant increase in the use of short-term percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) as acute circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and to provide haemodynamic support during interventional procedures, including high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Although frequently considered together, pVADs differ in their haemodynamic effects, management, indications, insertion techniques, and monitoring requirements. This consensus document summarizes the views of an expert panel by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) and appraises the value of short-term pVAD. It reviews the pathophysiological context and possible indications for pVAD in different clinical settings and provides guidance regarding the management of pVAD based on existing evidence and best current practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

Link

http://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article-pdf/10/5/570/39222038/zuab015.pdf

Reference117 articles.

1. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiovascular care: endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention;Rihal;J Am Coll Cardiol,2015

2. Clinical expert consensus document on the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist support devices during complex high-risk indicated PCI: Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology Working Group Endorsed by Spanish and Portuguese Interventional Cardiology Societies;Chieffo;Int J Cardiol,2019

3. Evaluating the learning curve in the prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subanalysis of the PROTECT II study;Henriques;Am Heart J,2014

4. Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials;Thiele;Eur Heart J,2017

5. Hemodynamics of mechanical circulatory support;Burkhoff;J Am Coll Card,2015

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assistance in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Short-Term Outcomes;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-09-10

2. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes;European Heart Journal;2024-08-30

3. Imaging in acute percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in adults: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) of the ESC, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (EuroELSO);European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging;2024-08-24

4. Analysis of the 2023 European Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement on the Management of Short-term Mechanical Circulatory Support of Cardiogenic Shock in Adults in the Intensive Cardiac Care Unit;Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-08

5. A Novel Predictive Score Model for Successful Weaning From Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock;Journal of Cardiac Failure;2024-08