Abstract
Abstract
It is generally regarded that a robust global financial safety net is a global public good. Yet public goods models that explain the existence of the global financial safety net cannot also explain why it is highly fragmented and provisioned so inequitably. This study shows that the global financial safety net's existence, fragmentation, and inequitable coverage can be explained by modeling the global financial safety net as a global club good. The primary finding of the model is that when a state has a monopoly on the provision of a non-rival and excludable good (i.e., a club good), separate multilateral and bilateral club governance structures emerge, each with a unique structure and cost. Brief case studies of the global financial safety net provisioned by the International Monetary Fund, the Federal Reserve, and the Bank for International Settlements support the model.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference50 articles.
1. The Politics of International Regime Complexity;Alter;Perspectives on Politics,2009
2. The Federal Reserve's Use of International Swap Lines;Baker;Arizona Law Review,2013
3. The Bank for International Settlements and the Debt Crisis: A New Role for the Central Bankers’ Bank;Bederman;International Tax & Business Lawyer,1988
4. Expanding Global Liquidity Insurance: Myths and Realities of the IMF's Precautionary Credit Lines;Birdsall,2017
5. The Bretton Woods International Monetary System: A Historical Overview;Bordo,1993
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献