Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California
2. University of Michigan
Abstract
Abstract
Scholarship suggests the profits from conquest have decreased over time. Given this, why were some states faster to abandon profit-motivated conquest, and why are some still seeking wealth from territorial control? We argue that land-rent dependence influences a regime's economic preference for territory. The more a state depends on rents extracted from land (i.e., the more land-oriented the economy), the greater its willingness to invest in securing control of territory. We develop a novel measure of land orientation, with 200 years of data, to evaluate the linkages between land orientation and military competition over territory. Across 160 regression models, we find robust evidence that land orientation predicts territorial competition. These results hold in both democracies and autocracies. The global reduction in land-oriented states offers a plausible explanation for the decline in the number of large-scale territorial conquests. Our findings also explain why some states retain strong economic motivations for conquest.
Funder
USC Center for International Studies
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference58 articles.
1. The Evolution of Territorial Conquest After 1945 and the Limits of the Territorial Integrity Norm;Altman;International Organization,2020
2. The Causes of Modern Conquest;Altman,2019
3. Bread before Guns or Butter: Introducing Surplus Domestic Product (SDP);Anders;International Studies Quarterly,2020
4. Long-Run Regional Population Disparities in Europe during Modern Economic Growth: A Case Study of Spain;Ayuda;The Annals of Regional Science,2010
5. The Timing of Industrialization across Countries;Bentzen,2013
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Co-Evolution and Spatial Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
2. More Measurement Issues for Diffusion, Zones of Peace, and Network Effects;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
3. Zones of Peace and Neighborhood Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
4. A Dyadic Perspective;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
5. Measurement Issues;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02