Comparison of cell response to chromatin and DNA damage

Author:

Luzhin Artyom1,Rajan Priyanka2,Safina Alfiya2,Leonova Katerina2,Stablewski Aimee3,Wang Jianmin4,Robinson Denisha2,Isaeva Natalia5ORCID,Kantidze Omar6,Gurova Katerina2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cellular Genomics, Institute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow 119334 , Russia

2. Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts , Buffalo , NY 14263 , USA

3. Gene Targeting and Transgenic Shared Resource, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts , Buffalo , NY 14263 , USA

4. Department of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts , Buffalo , NY 14263 , USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , NC  27599, USA

6. Quantori LLC , Cambridge , MA 02142 , USA

Abstract

Abstract DNA-targeting drugs are widely used for anti-cancer treatment. Many of these drugs cause different types of DNA damage, i.e. alterations in the chemical structure of DNA molecule. However, molecules binding to DNA may also interfere with DNA packing into chromatin. Interestingly, some molecules do not cause any changes in DNA chemical structure but interfere with DNA binding to histones and nucleosome wrapping. This results in histone loss from chromatin and destabilization of nucleosomes, a phenomenon that we call chromatin damage. Although the cellular response to DNA damage is well-studied, the consequences of chromatin damage are not. Moreover, many drugs used to study DNA damage also cause chromatin damage, therefore there is no clarity on which effects are caused by DNA or chromatin damage. In this study, we aimed to clarify this issue. We treated normal and tumor cells with bleomycin, nuclease mimicking drug which cut predominantly nucleosome-free DNA and therefore causes DNA damage in the form of DNA breaks, and CBL0137, which causes chromatin damage without direct DNA damage. We describe similarities and differences between the consequences of DNA and chromatin damage. Both agents were more toxic for tumor than normal cells, but while DNA damage causes senescence in both normal and tumor cells, chromatin damage does not. Both agents activated p53, but chromatin damage leads to the accumulation of higher levels of unmodified p53, which transcriptional activity was similar to or lower than that of p53 activated by DNA damage. Most importantly, we found that while transcriptional changes caused by DNA damage are limited by p53-dependent activation of a small number of p53 targets, chromatin damage activated many folds more genes in p53 independent manner.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute

Roswell Park Alliance Foundation

RSF

NCI

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics

Reference60 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3