Exposure Monitoring Strategies for Applying Low-Cost PM Sensors to Assess Flour Dust in Industrial Bakeries

Author:

Ruiter Sander1,Bard Delphine2,Ben Jeddi Hasnae1,Saunders John2,Snawder John3,Warren Nick2,Gorce Jean-Philippe2,Cauda Emanuele3,Kuijpers Eelco1,Pronk Anjoeka1

Affiliation:

1. Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Healthy Living and Work , RAPID 3584 CB Utrecht , The Netherlands

2. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), HSE Science and Research Centre , Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN , UK

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) , 1090 Tusculum Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45226 , USA

Abstract

AbstractLow-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors provide new methods for monitoring occupational exposure to hazardous substances, such as flour dust. These devices have many possible benefits, but much remains unknown about their performance for different exposure monitoring strategies in the workplace. We explored the performance of PM sensors for four different monitoring strategies (time-weighted average and high time resolution, each quantitative and semi-quantitative) for assessing occupational exposure using low-cost PM sensors in a field study in the industrial bakery sector. Measurements were collected using four types of sensor (PATS+, Isensit, Airbeam2, and Munisense) and two reference devices (respirable gravimetric samplers and an established time-resolved device) at two large-scale bakeries, spread over 11 participants and 6 measurement days. Average PM2.5 concentrations of the low-cost sensors were compared with gravimetric respirable concentrations for 8-h shift periods and 1-min PM2.5 concentrations of the low-cost sensors were compared with time-resolved PM2.5 data from the reference device (quantitative monitoring strategy). Low-cost sensors were also ranked in terms of exposure for 8-h shifts and for 15-min periods with a shift (semi-quantitative monitoring strategy). Environmental factors and methodological variables, which can affect sensor performance, were investigated. Semi-quantitative monitoring strategies only showed more accurate results compared with quantitative strategies when these were based on shift-average exposures. The main factors that influenced sensor performance were the type of placement (positioning the devices stationary versus personal) and the company or workstation where measurements were collected. Together, these findings provide an overview of common strengths and drawbacks of low-cost sensors and different ways these can be applied in the workplace. This can be used as a starting point for further investigations and the development of guidance documents and data analysis methods.

Funder

Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment

Health and Safety Executive

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference29 articles.

1. Effectiveness of interventions to reduce flour dust exposures in supermarket bakeries in South Africa;Baatjies;Occup Environ Med,2014

2. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4;Bates;J Stat Softw,2015

3. The occupational burden of nonmalignant respiratory diseases. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Statement;Blanc;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2019

4. Using 21st century science to improve risk-related evaluations.;Committee on Incorporating 21st Century Science into Risk-Based Evaluations,2017

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A light scattering model for large particles with surface roughness;Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer;2024-09

2. Spatiotemporal modeling of occupational particulate matter using personal low-cost sensor and indoor location tracking data;Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene;2024-08-29

3. Smart Bakery: Technology and Automation;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2024

4. Evaluation and calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for respirable coal mine dust monitoring;Aerosol Science and Technology;2023-12-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3