Rapid fiber-detection technique by artificial intelligence in phase-contrast microscope images of simulated atmospheric samples

Author:

Yamamoto Takashi1,Iwasaki Kazuharu2,Iida Yukiko3,Yuki Ken-ichi3,Nakaji Fumihiro2,Yamashiro Hayato2,Toyoguchi Toshiyuki3,Terazono Atsushi1

Affiliation:

1. National Institute for Environmental Studies , 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506 , Japan

2. Japan NUS Co., Ltd , 7-5-25 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-0023 , Japan

3. Environmental Control Center Co., Ltd , 3-7-23 Sanda-machi, Hachioji, Tokyo 193-0832 , Japan

Abstract

Abstract Since the manufacture, import, and use of asbestos products have been completely abolished in Japan, the main cause of asbestos emissions into the atmosphere is the demolition and removal of buildings built with asbestos-containing materials. To detect and correct asbestos emissions from inappropriate demolition and removal operations at an early stage, a rapid method to measure atmospheric asbestos fibers is required. The current rapid measurement method is a combination of short-term atmospheric sampling and phase-contrast microscopy counting. However, visual counting takes a considerable amount of time and is not sufficiently fast. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze microscope images to detect fibers may greatly reduce the time required for counting. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the use of AI image analysis for detecting fibers in phase-contrast microscope images. A series of simulated atmospheric samples prepared from standard samples of amosite and chrysotile were observed using a phase-contrast microscope. Images were captured, and training datasets were created from the counting results of expert analysts. We adopted 2 types of AI models—an instance segmentation model, namely the mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN), and a semantic segmentation model, namely the multi-level aggregation network (MA-Net)—that were trained to detect asbestos fibers. The accuracy of fiber detection achieved with the Mask R-CNN model was 57% for recall and 46% for precision, whereas the accuracy achieved with the MA-Net model was 95% for recall and 91% for precision. Therefore, satisfactory results were obtained with the MA-Net model. The time required for fiber detection was less than 1 s per image in both AI models, which was faster than the time required for counting by an expert analyst.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference21 articles.

1. Evaluation of the Magiscan Image Analyzer for asbestos fiber counting;Baron,1987

2. Deep learning based asbestos fiber detection;Biswas,2021

3. Asbestos detection with fluorescence microscopy images and deep learning;Cai,2021

4. MA-Net: a multi-scale attention network for liver and tumor segmentation;Fan,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3