Affiliation:
1. International Studies and Political Science, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA, USA
Abstract
AbstractThis article argues that dynamics among rivals can affect how host states respond to refugees. Particularly, refugees from rival states can motivate host countries to promote inclusive action because they are exiled from an adversary. By treating refugees well and openly respecting their human rights, host states can, in effect, shame their rival, thereby undermining the adversary's legitimacy and discrediting the opposing government in the eyes of the international community. In the absence of a strategic rivalry, host governments do not have this incentive to support refugee human rights. Using statistical analyses, I find support for these hypotheses. In particular, the arrival of refugees from a neighboring rival state are associated with the strongest increase in respect for human rights within the host country, whereas refugees from a noncontiguous, nonrival state are related to a decrease in respect for human rights.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference149 articles.
1. Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security;Adamson;International Security,2006
2. Engendering Empathy, Begetting Backlash: American Attitudes Toward Syrian Refugees;Adida,2017
3. Why Muslim Integration Fails in Christian-Heritage Societies
4. Syrian Refugees in Turkey and Integration Problem Ahead;Akar;Journal of International Migration and Integration,2018
5. Turkish PM: Syria Crackdown Inhumane;Al Jazeera,2011
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献