Affiliation:
1. University of Southern Maine/Harvard Kennedy School
Abstract
AbstractRecent scholarship on nuclear proliferation finds that many forms of nuclear assistance increase the odds that recipient states pursue nuclear weapons programs. While these studies may help us understand select cases of proliferation, they overshadow the role of nuclear supply in bolstering global nonproliferation efforts. After the risks of nuclear assistance became well-known following India's nuclear explosion in 1974, most major suppliers conditioned their assistance on recipients joining nonproliferation agreements. Case studies of states’ decision-making regarding these agreements illustrate how the provision of nuclear technology has been an effective tool in persuading states to join such agreements, the most important of which is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). By joining the NPT, states strengthen the global nonproliferation regime and increase the costs of any potential future decision to proliferate. The offer of nuclear assistance has done far more to bolster global nuclear nonproliferation efforts than recent research suggests.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Safety Research
Reference81 articles.
1. “Algeria: Big Deal in the Desert?”;Albright;Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,2001
2. “Examining Explanations for Nuclear Proliferation.”;Bell;International Studies Quarterly,2016
3. “When Did (and Didn't) States Proliferate? Chronicling the Spread of Nuclear Weapons.”;Bleek,2017
4. “Correspondence: Civilian Nuclear Cooperation and the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.”;Bluth;International Security,2010
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献