Affiliation:
1. University of Denver and Peterson Institute for International Economics
Abstract
AbstractIn the field of global security studies, inclusion, both in terms of process and outcomes, is certainly having a moment. Like many terms widely adopted by the international security and development communities, the utility of the discourse around inclusion stems in part from its ambiguity. The various contributions to this special issue make good and productive use of this ambiguity and have moved the discussion of inclusive approaches to governance, violence reduction, and peace-building forward. In doing so, however, they have put forth very different conceptualizations and operationalizations of inclusion and exclusion. Thus, my contribution to this symposium identifies these various conceptualizations, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of proposed measures, and concludes with remarks on the normative implications of these analyses.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference19 articles.
1. “Intergroup Violence and Attitudes: Evidence from a Dividing Sudan.”;Beber;Journal of Politics,2014
2. “Whom You Don't Know, You Don't Trust: Vernacular Security, Distrust and Its Exclusionary Effect in Post-Conflict Societies.”;Benzing;Journal of Global Security Studies,2019
3. War, Women, and Power
4. “Hosting Your Enemy: Accepting Refugees from a Rival and Respect for Human Rights.”;Chu;Journal of Global Security Studies,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献