Abstract
AbstractThis article intervenes in discussions about the circulation of policing knowledge and the politics of expertise. As part of a broader conversation about transnational reconfigurations of state power, critical scholars have drawn attention to the influence of global policing “models” and “private” experts in shaping policy. They show how such figures and forms of knowhow symbolically enforce urban order and dispossess marginalized communities under conditions of neoliberal crisis. While incisive, these approaches can unduly portray expert authority as boundless and unassailable. This article argues that a sustained theoretical engagement with questions about controversies and failure opens up fruitful avenues to unsettle the perceived smoothness, inevitability, and omnipotence of experts in relation to politics and governing. Drawing on insights from actor-network theory (ANT), it situates deference to global experts as interventions that seek to enact and police the terms of “reality” concerning urban order. This approach allows us to better understand how such interventions work but also how they misfire and come undone. These claims are developed through a close reading of UK Prime Minister David Cameron's attempt to solicit policy advice from renowned global “supercop” William Bratton in the aftermath of the 2011 England riots.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference113 articles.
1. Bruno Latour and Ecology Politics: Poetics of Failure and Denial in IR;Agathangelou;Millennium,2016
2. War, Police, Critique;Aradau;London Review of International Law,2015
3. Assembling (Non)Knowledge: Security, Law, and Surveillance in a Digital World;Aradau;International Political Sociology,2017
4. Assembling Credibility: Knowledge, Method and Critique in Times of ‘Post-Truth.’;Aradau;Security Dialogue,2019
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献