When to Protect? Using the Crosswise Model to Integrate Protected and Direct Responses in Surveys of Sensitive Behavior

Author:

Gingerich Daniel W.,Oliveros Virginia,Corbacho Ana,Ruiz-Vega Mauricio

Abstract

Sensitive survey techniques (SSTs) are frequently used to study sensitive behaviors. However, existing strategies for employing SSTs lead to highly variable prevalence estimates and do not permit analysts to address the question of whether the use of an SST is actually necessary. The current article presents a survey questioning strategy and corresponding statistical framework that fills this gap. By jointly analyzing survey responses generated by an SST (the crosswise model) along with direct responses about the sensitive behavior, the article's framework addresses the question of whether the use of an SST is required to study a given sensitive behavior, provides an efficient estimate of the prevalence of the sensitive behavior, and, in its extended form, efficiently estimates how individual characteristics relate to the likelihood of engaging in the behavior. The utility of the approach is demonstrated through an examination of gender differences in proclivities towards corruption in Costa Rica.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference56 articles.

1. Statistical Analysis of List Experiments

2. An important feature of the delivery of this component of the survey consisted of a script describing to respondents how a hypothetical individual with a particular value on a sensitive item and a mother born in a particular month would respond to a given crosswise item. This script was delivered orally to all respondents prior to the commencement of the sensitive questions of interest. Focus group sessions conducted in San José with Costa Ricans of varied backgrounds in August 2013, prior to fielding the household survey, demonstrated that including a script of this sort considerably enhanced understanding and comfort with the technique.

3. A validation of a computer-assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security

4. GENDER AND PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD CORRUPTION AND TAX EVASION

5. Reducing Social Desirability Bias through Item Randomized Response: An Application to Measure Underreported Desires

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3