Patient-specific mental rehearsal with three-dimensional models before low anterior resection: randomized clinical trial

Author:

Yiasemidou M12ORCID,Mushtaq F3,Basheer M4,Galli R5,Panagiotou D6,Stock S7ORCID,Preston N3,Mon-Williams M3,Jayne D G15ORCID,Miskovic D8

Affiliation:

1. Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK

2. Academic Surgery, University of Hull, Hull, UK

3. School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

4. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Pinderfields Hospital, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK

5. Department of Colorectal Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK

6. General Surgery, York Teaching Hospital, York, UK

7. General and Trauma Surgery, World Mate Emergency Hospital, Battambang, Cambodia

8. Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background It was hypothesized that preparing for a surgical procedure, taking into account individual patient characteristics, may facilitate the procedure and improve surgical quality. The aim of this study was to compare different case-specific, preoperative mental rehearsal methods before minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. Methods In this RCT, patients were allocated in a 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to four groups: systematic mental rehearsal (SMR) using MRI scans; SMR and three-dimensional (3D) virtual models; SMR and synthetic 3D printed models; and routine practice (control group). Surgeons operating on all but the control group underwent mental rehearsal with the visual aids, including axial MRI scans of the pelvis, interactive 3D virtual models reconstructed from axial MRIs, and synthetic models, manufactured by 3D printing. Operations were video-recorded and assessed by two experts blinded to allocation using two validated scores, the Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) and Objective Clinical Human Reliability Analysis (OCHRA). The primary outcome of the study was surgical performance, measured by the CAT. Results Forty-nine patients were randomized and allocated to the four groups. There were 12 participants in each of the control, MRI and SMR, and virtual and SMR groups, whereas the SMR using physical models and simulation group included 13. No difference was observed between groups in median CAT scores (control 30.50, MRI 34.25, virtual 31.75, physical 34.00; P = 0.748, partial η2 <0.001, where pη2 is indicative of effect size) or OCHRA scores (anterior, posterior, right and left lateral planes, transection P>0.200, pη2 =0.052–0.088). Time spent not performing dissection was significantly shorter for the SMR with MRI group than for the control (57.5 versus 42 respectively; P < 0.001, pη2 =0.212). Conclusion Mental rehearsal did not affect CAT and OCHRA scores of consultant surgeons. Reference number: ISRCTN 75603704 (https://www.isrctn.com).

Funder

Leeds Cares

Pelican Cancer Foundation

A. G. Leventis Foundation

MRC

Alan Turing Institute and a Research

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. The impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer;Bertani;Hepatogastroenterology,2014

2. Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer;Fernandez Ananin;Surg Endosc,2014

3. Multivariate evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer;Akagi;Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2012

4. Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study;Veenhof;Int J Colorectal Dis,2008

5. Is patient-specific pre-operative preparation feasible in a clinical environment? A systematic review and meta-analysis;Yiasemidou;Comput Assist Surg,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3