Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Author:

Fisher Oliver M123,Brown Chris4,Esquivel Jesus5,Larsen Stein G6,Liauw Winston27,Alzahrani Nayef A18,Morris David L1,Kepenekian Vahan910,Sourrouille Isabelle11,Dumont Frédéric12ORCID,Tuech Jean-Jacques13ORCID,Ceribelli Cécilia14,Doussot Béranger15,Sgarbura Olivia1617ORCID,Alhosni Mohammed18,Quenet Francois17,Glehen Olivier910,Cashin Peter H1920ORCID, ,Flatmark Kjersti,Graf Wilhelm,Takala Heikki,Lowy Andrew M,Chua Terence,Pelz Joerg,Baratti Dario,Baumgartner Joel M,Berri Richard,Bretcha-Boix Pedro,Deraco Marcello,Flores-Ayala Guillermo,Gomez-Portilla Alberto,González-Moreno Santiago,Goodman Martin,Halkia Evgenia,Kusamura Shigeki,Moller Mecker,Passot Guillaume,Pocard Marc,Salti George,Sardi Armando,Senthil Maheswari,Spilioitis John,Torres-Melero Juan,Turaga Kiran,Bereder Jean-Marc,Bernard Jean-Louis,Bakrin Naoual,Carrère Sébastien,Coget Julien,Cotte Eddy,Facy Olivier,Gelli Maximiliano,Gilly François-Noël,Ortega-Deballon Pablo,Passot Guillaume,Rat Patrick,Rousset Pascal,Thibaudeau Emilie,Vaudoyer Delphine

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, St George Hospital , Sydney, NSW , Australia

2. St George & Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Australia , Kogarah, NSW , Australia

3. Notre Dame University School of Medicine , Sydney, NSW , Australia

4. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre , Sydney, NSW , Australia

5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Frederick Memorial Hospital , Frederick, Maryland , USA

6. Department of Surgical Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway

7. Department of Medical Oncology, St George Hospital , Sydney, NSW , Australia

8. Department of surgery, National Guard Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia

9. Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Lyon , France

10. EA 3738 CICLY, Université Lyon 1 , Lyon , France

11. Department of Surgery, Institute Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France

12. Department of Oncological Surgery, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau , St Herblain , France

13. Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Rouen , Rouen , France

14. Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire l’Archet II , Nice , France

15. Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne , Dijon , France

16. IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier , Montpellier , France

17. Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier , Montpellier , France

18. Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital SQUH , Muscat , Oman

19. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden

20. Department of Surgery, Akademiska Sjukhuset , Uppsala , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background This study evaluated the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (pmCRC) in a large international data set of patients. Patients and Methods Patients with pmCRC from 39 centres who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC between 1991 and 2018 were selected and compared for the HIPEC protocols received—oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus mitomycin-HIPEC. Following analysis of crude data, propensity-score matching (PSM) and Cox-proportional hazard modelling were performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the HIPEC dose–response effects (high versus low dose, dose intensification and double drug protocols) on OS, RFS and 90-day morbidity. Furthermore, the impact of the treatment time period was assessed. Results Of 2760 patients, 2093 patients were included. Median OS was 43 months (95% c.i. 41 to 46 months) with a median RFS of 12 months (95% c.i. 12 to 13 months). The oxaliplatin-HIPEC group had an OS of 47 months (95% c.i. 42 to 53 months) versus 39 months (95% c.i. 36 to 43 months) in the mitomycin-HIPEC group (P = 0.002), aHR 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.67 to 0.90, P < 0.001. The OS benefit persisted after PSM of the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group and mitomycin-HIPEC group (48 months (95% c.i. 42 to 59 months) versus 40 months (95% c.i. 37 to 44 months)), P < 0.001, aHR 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.65 to 0.94), P = 0.009. Similarly, matched RFS was significantly higher for oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus others (13 months (95% c.i. 12 to 15 months) versus 11 months (95% c.i. 10 to 12 months, P = 0.02)). High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC protocols had similar OS compared to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. HIPEC dose intensification within each protocol resulted in improved survival. Oxaliplatin + irinotecan-HIPEC resulted in the most improved OS (61 months (95% c.i. 51 to 101 months)). Ninety-day mortality in both crude and PSM analysis was worse for mitomycin-HIPEC. There was no change in treatment effect depending on the analysed time period. Conclusions Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC provided better outcomes compared to mitomycin-based HIPEC. High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC was similar to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. The 90-day mortality difference favours the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group. A trend for dose–response between low- and high-dose HIPEC was reported.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3