Impact of preoperative uni- or multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative morbidity: meta-analysis

Author:

Cambriel Amélie123ORCID,Choisy Benjamin3,Hedou Julien3,Bonnet Marie-Pierre245,Fellous Souad1,Lefevre Jérémie H6ORCID,Voron Thibault6,Gaudillière Dyani7,Kin Cindy8,Gaudillière Brice3,Verdonk Franck123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris , Paris , France

2. GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris , Paris , France

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California , USA

4. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University , Paris , France

5. Obstetrical Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Université Paris Cité, CRESS, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA , Paris , France

6. Sorbonne University and Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris , Paris , France

7. Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University , Stanford, California , USA

8. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University , Stanford, California , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative complications occur in up to 43% of patients after surgery, resulting in increased morbidity and economic burden. Prehabilitation has the potential to increase patients’ preoperative health status and thereby improve postoperative outcomes. However, reported results of prehabilitation are contradictory. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes (postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, pain at postoperative day 1) in patients undergoing elective surgery. Methods The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs published between January 2006 and June 2023 comparing prehabilitation programmes lasting ≥14 days to ‘standard of care’ (SOC) and reporting postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Database searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO. The primary outcome examined was the effect of uni- or multimodal prehabilitation on 30-day complications. Secondary outcomes were length of ICU and hospital stay (LOS) and reported pain scores. Results Twenty-five studies (including 2090 patients randomized in a 1:1 ratio) met the inclusion criteria. Average methodological study quality was moderate. There was no difference between prehabilitation and SOC groups in regard to occurrence of postoperative complications (OR = 1.02, 95% c.i. 0.93 to 1.13; P = 0.10; I2 = 34%), total hospital LOS (−0.13 days; 95% c.i. −0.56 to 0.28; P = 0.53; I2 = 21%) or reported postoperative pain. The ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the prehabilitation group (−0.57 days; 95% c.i. −1.10 to −0.04; P = 0.03; I2 = 46%). Separate comparison of uni- and multimodal prehabilitation showed no difference for either intervention. Conclusion Prehabilitation reduces ICU LOS compared with SOC in elective surgery patients but has no effect on overall complication rates or total LOS, regardless of modality. Prehabilitation programs need standardization and specific targeting of those patients most likely to benefit.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3