Primary entry trocar design and entry-related complications at laparoscopy in obese patients: meta-analysis

Author:

Miti Chimwemwe1ORCID,Busuulwa Paula2,Scott Richard3,Bloomfield-Gadelha Hermes4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Digital Health and Care, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK

2. Department of Academic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Liverpool Women’s Hospital , Liverpool , UK

3. Department of Engineering Mathematics and Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK

4. Department of Medical Physics, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS FT , Bristol , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Safe primary entry at laparoscopy could present challenges in obese patients. Various techniques have been proposed in previous studies, however, the characteristics of the actual device utilized may be more influential than the technique in achieving successful abdominal entry in patients with increased BMI. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis included both randomized and non-randomized studies gathered with no date filters from MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov. PRISMA guidelines underpinned the conduct and reporting of the review. The meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a generalized linear mixed model and analyses included random-effects models. The primary outcome was the proportion of first access vascular and visceral injuries incurred in the process of laparoscopic abdominal surgery in patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2. Subgroup analysis was performed for optical versus non-optically enabled devices. Results In total, 5403 patients were analysed across 13 observational studies with a mean BMI of 45.93 kg/m2. In 216 patients from two randomized studies, the mean BMI was 39.92 kg/m2. The overall incidence using a random-effects model was 8.1 per 1000 events of visceral and vascular injuries (95 per cent c.i. 0.003 to 0.024). Heterogeneity was statistically significant at I2 = 80.5 per cent (69.6 per cent; 87.5 per cent, P< 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis, a tendency towards reduced injuries when optical devices were employed was observed with one per 100 injuries in these trocars (95 per cent c.i. 0.001 to 0.018) versus four per 100 (95 per cent c.i. −0.019 to –0.102) in non-optically enabled devices. Conclusion Injuries during primary laparoscopic entry undertaken in obese patient groups are uncommon. Due to considerable heterogeneity in the small number of examined studies, evidence was insufficient and largely of low quality to ascribe differences in the incidence of injuries to the characteristics of the primary entry trocar utilized.

Funder

EPSRC

in Digital Health & Care, University of Bristol

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference66 articles.

1. Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques;Munro;Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2002

2. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review;Ljungqvist;JAMA Surg,2017

3. Complications of laparoscopy;Hulka;Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol,1980

4. Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry;Molloy;Aust Nz J Obstet Gyn,2002

5. Risks associated with laparoscopic entry;Collinet;J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod,2010

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3