Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review

Author:

Melly Conor12ORCID,McGeehan Gearoid12ORCID,O’Connor Niall1ORCID,Johnston Alison1ORCID,Bass Gary34ORCID,Mohseni Shahin5ORCID,Donohoe Claire6ORCID,Bucholc Magda7ORCID,Sugrue Michael18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy , Donegal, Ireland

2. University of Limerick School of Medicine, University of Limerick , Limerick, Ireland

3. Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

4. School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University , Orebro, Sweden

5. Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery Orebro University Hospital, & School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University , Orebro, Sweden

6. Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, St James’ Hospital , Dublin, Ireland

7. Intelligent Systems Research Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Magee Campus , Derry-Londonderry, UK

8. EU INTERREG Centre for Personalized Medicine, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Magee Campus , Derry-Londonderry, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A PROSPERO-registered (registration number CRD42021261707) systematic review was undertaken for all relevant English language articles using PubMed version of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases in June 2021. The search used Boolean operators and wildcards and included the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND patient outcome OR patient-reported outcome OR patient-reported outcome measure OR PRO OR PROM. Medical Subjects Heading terms were used to search PubMed and Scopus. Articles published from 1 January 2011 to 2 June 2021 were included. Results A total of 4960 individual articles were reviewed in this study, of which 44 were found to evaluate PROMs in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) grading. Twenty-one articles spanning 19 countries and four continents met all inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative data synthesis. There was significant heterogeneity in PROMs identified with eight different comprehensive PROM tools used in the 21 studies. There was wide variation in the time points at which PROMs were recorded. Fourteen of 21 studies recorded PROMs before and after surgery, and 7 of 21 recorded PROMs only after surgery. Follow-up intervals ranged from 3 days to 2 years after surgery. Conclusions This study identified that while post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROMs are infrequently measured currently, tools are widely available to achieve this in clinical practice. PROMs may not capture all the outcomes but should be incorporated into future cholecystectomy outcome research. The EQ-5D™ (EuroQoL Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) provides a simple platform for the modern digital era.

Funder

European Union’s INTERREG VA Programme

Special EU Programmes Body

Donegal Clinical, and Research Academy

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3