Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study

Author:

Burghgraef Thijs A12ORCID,Hol Jeroen C34ORCID,Rutgers Marieke L5,Brown Gina67,Hompes Roel5,Sietses Colin3,Consten Esther C J12,Crolla R M P H,Geitenbeek R T J,Geloven A A W van,Leijtens J W A,Polat F,Pronk A,Smits A B,Tuynman J B,Verdaasdonk E G G,Verheijen P M,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center , Amersfoort , The Netherlands

2. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands

3. Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei , Ede , The Netherlands

4. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

5. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

6. Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden , London , UK

7. Department of Radiology, Imperial College London , London , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background The introduction of the sigmoid take-off definition might lead to a shift from rectal cancers to sigmoid cancers. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the clinical impact of the new definition. Methods In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they underwent an elective, curative total mesorectal excision for non-metastasized rectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2017, were registered in the Dutch Colorectal Audit as having a rectal cancer according to the previous definition, and if MRI was available. All selected rectal cancer cases were reassessed using the sigmoid take-off definition. The primary outcome was the number of patients reassessed with a sigmoid cancer. Secondary outcomes included differences between the newly defined rectal and sigmoid cancer patients in treatment, perioperative results, and 3-year oncological outcomes (overall and disease-free survivals, and local and systemic recurrences). Results Out of 1742 eligible patients, 1302 rectal cancer patients were included. Of these, 170 (13.1 per cent) were reclassified as having sigmoid cancer. Among these, 93 patients (54.7 per cent) would have been offered another adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment according to the Dutch guideline. Patients with a sigmoid tumour after reassessment had a lower 30-day postoperative complication rate (33.5 versus 48.3 per cent, P < 0.001), lower reintervention rate (8.8 versus 17.4 per cent, P < 0.007), and a shorter length of stay (a median of 5 days (i.q.r. 4–7) versus a median of 6 days (i.q.r. 5–9), P < 0.001). Three-year oncological outcomes were comparable. Conclusion Using the anatomical landmark of the sigmoid take-off, 13.1 per cent of the previously classified patients with rectal cancer had sigmoid cancer, and 54.7 per cent of these patients would have been treated differently with regard to neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant therapy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3