Affiliation:
1. University of Connecticut , USA
2. University of Southern California , USA
Abstract
Abstract
This article brings a broad array of works, which pertain to different research areas of international relations (IR), into contact with each other via a graphic method, systemism, to obtain insights that otherwise might prove elusive. Completion of these tasks is anticipated to exemplify how the systemist approach can enhance communication throughout IR. Systemism is introduced as a graphic technique for communicating arguments. Systemist graphics are used to convey the contents of (a) two studies that focus on theory per se and (b) a range of topics—foreign policy analysis, forecasting, and conflict processes. Systematic synthesis focusing on the two works about theory and bricolagic bridging that is based on all five studies reveal the contributions of a systemist approach, respectively, to the logics of confirmation and discovery. Value added from the systemist approach is confirmed for both IR research and pedagogy.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference34 articles.
1. Induction and Deduction in International Relations: Squaring the Circle between Theory and Evidence;Blagden;International Studies Review,2016
2. Coding in Tongues: Developing Non-English Coding Schemes for Leadership Profiling;Brummer;International Studies Review,2020
3. A New Model for Predicting Policy Choices: Preliminary Tests;Bueno De Mesquita;Conflict Management and Peace Science,2011
4. Understanding the New Middle Eastern Leaders: An Operational Code Approach;Canbolat,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献