Taxed fairly? How differences in perception shape attitudes towards progressive taxation

Author:

Kalleitner Fabian12ORCID,Bobzien Licia34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sociology, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany

2. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria

3. Jacques Delors Centre, Hertie School , Berlin , Germany

4. Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Potsdam , Potsdam , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Empirically, the poor are more likely to support increases in the level of tax progressivity than the rich. Such income-stratified tax preferences can result from differences in preferences of what should be taxed as argued by previous literature. However, it may also result from income-stratified perceptions of what is taxed. This paper argues that the rich perceive higher levels of tax progressivity than the poor and that tax perceptions affect individuals’ support for progressive taxation. Using data from an Austrian survey experiment, we test this argument in three steps: First, in line with past research, we show that individuals’ income positions are connected to individuals’ tax preferences as a self-interest rationale would predict. However, second, we show that this variation is mainly driven by income-stratified tax perceptions. Third, randomly informing a subset of the sample about actual tax rates, we find that changing tax perceptions causally affects support for redistributive taxation among those who initially overestimated the level of tax progressivity. Our results indicate that tax perceptions are relevant for forming tax preferences and suggest that individuals are more polarized in their perceptions of who pays how much taxes than in their support for who should pay how much tax.

Funder

Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference57 articles.

1. Unfair inequality and the demand for redistribution: why not all inequality is equal;Ahrens;Socio-Economic Review,2022

2. Fairness and redistribution;Alesina;The American Economic Review,2005

3. Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: are Americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than Scandinavians;Almas;Journal of Political Economy,2020

4. Tax compliance;Andreoni;Journal of Economic Literature,1998

5. Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers;Bansak;Nature Human Behavior,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3